By a Community Reporter
Indivisible Rockland presents itself as a grassroots organization promoting peaceful civic engagement, voter education, and accountability for elected officials. However, a growing body of reporting, photographs, and eyewitness accounts from recent protests and town halls is raising questions among Rockland County residents about whether the group’s tactics align with those stated goals.
Several town halls hosted by Congressman Mike Lawler over the past year have been widely described in regional media as contentious and disruptive. Reports document repeated interruptions, chanting, shouting, and confrontations that at times prevented the meetings from proceeding as intended.
In some instances, moderators struggled to maintain order, and law enforcement was called upon to remove attendees who refused to follow event rules. Critics argue that these disruptions limited opportunities for other constituents — including seniors, families, and first – time attendees — to ask questions or be heard.
Editorial coverage from the Yonkers Times intensified scrutiny after photographs from anti Lawler protests showed demonstrators carrying Nazi related imagery, including Hitler references and swastika symbolism. The publication criticized the use of such imagery as inflammatory and counterproductive, stating that invoking symbols associated with hate and genocide undermines any claim to moral authority or inclusive advocacy.
The imagery drew particular concern because some protesters simultaneously labeled political opponents as “Nazis,” a contradiction that commentators say damages civil discourse and risks alienating large segments of the community.
Photos and videos circulating online from protests and town halls consistently show crowds that appear predominantly older, white, and economically comfortable, with little visible racial or ethnic diversity.
While no formal demographic data has been released, residents have questioned how representative these gatherings are of Rockland County’s broader population, particularly given the group’s stated focus on equity and inclusion.
Indivisible Rockland’s actions are heavily organized online, with turnout, messaging, and timing promoted through social media and national activist platforms. While there is no verified evidence that participants are paid, the coordination mirrors professional advocacy campaigns rather than spontaneous grassroots protests.
Based on public posts and event listings, recent and upcoming actions associated with Indivisible Rockland and allied activist networks have focused on several recurring targets, including Congressman Mike Lawler’s town halls and public appearances, the Four Corners intersection in Nanuet as a regular protest site, and participation in national issue based demonstrations tied to broader political movements.
Lawler’s office has confirmed a Rockland County town hall scheduled for Sunday, February 1, 2026, at 6 p.m., with advance registration required and proof of residency necessary for attendance. Social media posts encouraging supporters to register and attend have already circulated within activist networks.
Given the tone and conduct of prior town halls, some residents and local officials have expressed concern that the upcoming meeting could again become disruptive rather than serve as a forum for civil exchange.
Rockland County has a long history of protest, debate, and civic participation. But many residents say the recent atmosphere at town halls represents a shift away from dialogue toward confrontation.
As one longtime Rockland resident who attended a recent meeting said, “Protest is part of democracy. But when no one else can speak, it stops being a town hall and becomes something else.”
With additional trainings, rallies, and actions being promoted in the weeks ahead, community leaders and residents across the political spectrum are urging all groups involved to recommit publicly to peaceful conduct, respectful language, and a clear rejection of offensive imagery.
For many in Rockland County, the concern is not partisan. It is about preserving civic spaces where disagreement can exist without chaos.